When it comes to wiping a surface – whether it’s a counter or machine part – there’s a perception that using a rag or laundered cloth multiple times is less wasteful than using a disposable wipe.

Rags and laundered cloths made of certain material (including recycled clothing) can often complicate instead of improving the manufacturing processes, according to the Kimberly-Clark Professional report “Industrial Wipers: How They Impact Product Quality, Productivity, Worker Health & the Environment.”

Because rags and cloths sometimes leave behind lint, dirt and debris, using them can compromise a manufacturing process and those contaminants can potentially get into the product being manufactured, resulting in rework.

“If anything, rags and laundered cloths increase defects,” said Ankur Gupta, category manager, WypAll^® Wipes, at Kimberly-Clark Professional. For instance, rags that have been used to wipe down industrial equipment contain debris like metal shavings and pins.

A 2011 study conducted by Gradient, an environmental and risk science consulting firm, and co-sponsored by Kimberly-Clark Professional found that a worker using up to 12 laundered shop towels a day may be exposed to high levels of antimony, cadmium and lead.

“For goodness' sake, asking people ‘Why do you use a rag?’ is like asking ‘Why would you use a used piece of underwear?’ when you’re doing your work,” Gupta said. 

Here are some other reasons why rags and laundered cloths are not as dependable as industrial wipes:

Rags

• Are inconsistent in size, shape and material
• May not be suitable for purpose, leading to waste

Laundered Cloths

• Can retain lead, a toxic heavy metal
• Not engineered for specific applications

Disposable Wipes Are More Efficient Than You Think

Disposable wipes like WypAll Wipes are absorbent, making it quick to clean a piece of equipment and can reduce machine stoppages. 

“When choosers use the right tools, they will ultimately see that they can impact quality, delivery and costs in a much bigger way than they could have imagined,” Gupta said. “Now that’s efficiency.”